<body><script type="text/javascript"> function setAttributeOnload(object, attribute, val) { if(window.addEventListener) { window.addEventListener('load', function(){ object[attribute] = val; }, false); } else { window.attachEvent('onload', function(){ object[attribute] = val; }); } } </script> <div id="navbar-iframe-container"></div> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://apis.google.com/js/platform.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript"> gapi.load("gapi.iframes:gapi.iframes.style.bubble", function() { if (gapi.iframes && gapi.iframes.getContext) { gapi.iframes.getContext().openChild({ url: 'https://www.blogger.com/navbar/2401752112466451514?origin\x3dhttp://mjc08s105.blogspot.com', where: document.getElementById("navbar-iframe-container"), id: "navbar-iframe" }); } }); </script>
Monday, February 9, 2009
Qn 1a answer structure
This is for those who had missed the econs tutorials for orientation. I am only typing this question out as it is the only question that I found that contains the K multiplier which is tested tommorow. I will photocopy it for anyone who wants it together. Also, I cant type out the diagram online so I will just use the words. I will type out what I have copied down in class.

Start:Intro
-Investment is a form of injection
-Addition to the circular flow of income
-Definition: Total planned expenditure on goods and services.
-Definition of investments: Process of creating capital ( K ) goods.
-Planned expenditure = income.




-J = W
-J = injection = investments + government spending + exports
-W = Savings + taxes + imports
-J increase. J > W
-Expenditure > Income
-Income of firm producing capital goods Increase
-This will spark off another round of consumption
-At the same time, part of the addition Income is withdrawn as savings, taxes and imports.
-Process continues until J = W
-The new equilibrium is at C ( fig 1 ) where the national Income is at Y1 income level.
-Hence, increase in expenditure has incrased national income.






















-K = multiplier
-Change in Y= K x Change in I -----------(1) (I suppose Y = national Income while I = investment)
-The value of K is given by eqn 2.
-K= 1/MPW ---------------(2)
-Eqn 2 shows that the lower the marginal propensity to withdraw (MPW), the larger the multiplier. Hence, the larger will be the impact on national I by a given Change in Y.
-However, the AE model is based on the assumption of the excess capacity. This may not be the case in the economy. If I increase but the economy is at full employment already, inflation may result. Thus in this case, the increase in I will not lead to the increase in national Income.










~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~




Sidenote:
-Norminal Income --> How much % Income increase
-Real I --> How much % Income increase and how much % increase in price level. ( Relative. If im not wrong, when the income increase, the real income may not increase due to inflation. )
-Mutiplier effect stops when Change in I = Change in W.






the profile
MJC 08S105!


Homework


Upcoming Events




leave a tag



wandering
time machine
credits
4 lovely people :)
anxiety
klayemi
dafont
miss m




08s105